Case study · Industrial SCADA

CABB logo

Improving decision-making for a system serving 1M+ residents.

CABB operates the SCADA system behind a regional water utility. The interface was making decisions slower than the operators making them — so we rebuilt it around how the work actually happens.

CABB SCADA system redesign — hero illustration

At a glance.

Six months. One designer. A before-and-after survey with the people running the plants every day.

Data visualization IoT Internal tool Government

Satisfaction

+30%user satisfaction

Reported by operators in the post-launch survey, against the same task set they'd run for years.

Onboarding

−20%time-to-confidence

New operators reached competence faster, measured from first shift to unsupervised operation.

Reach

1M+residents served

The system the redesigned dashboard runs supplies water across the utility's full coverage area.

On-site research with CABB plant operators during the SCADA redesign

About the project.

CABB was modernising their SCADA system — the interface plant operators use to monitor and control the water network. Operators had been raising usability issues for years. The new platform was the chance to fix them.

I was the only designer on the project, working alongside the PM and dev team. The brief: understand the operators, redesign the interface, and leave behind a design system the team could keep building on.

Context.

Role & team

  • Principal Product Designer (end-to-end)
  • Working with PM and developers
  • 6-month timeline: alignment → research → validation → implementation
  • Web app, desktop-first

Users & constraints

  • Water-plant operators and their managers
  • Legacy data feeds and system integrations
  • Stakeholders across municipal and operations leadership
  • Real shifts running 24/7 — no room for downtime

A confusing interface.

The existing dashboard was creating real operational drag — and forcing operators to compensate around it.

Confusing layout. Inconsistent hierarchy. Visual feedback that didn't match what the system was actually doing. And under all of it, an onboarding gap: every new hire was being trained around the interface, not by it.

Research goal: understand the operators' real pain points and design something that reduces errors instead of inviting them.

The legacy CABB SCADA interface, before redesign

Understanding operators on their floor.

Industrial UX is contextual UX. None of this works from a desk.

01 — Site visit

Process mapping

Walked the plant. Mapped the operational process end to end and the moments where the interface was getting in the way.

02 — Workshop

Design Thinking

Facilitated a workshop with operators, managers, and engineers to surface needs and co-create the directions worth testing.

03 — Shadowing

User shadowing

Spent shifts with operators in their actual environment, watching the small adaptations they'd built up around the old interface.

04 — Interviews

Recurring interviews

Held one-on-ones throughout the project, so direction stayed grounded in the people who'd be using it the next morning.

4

iterations of the dashboard tested with operators before the design was locked.

Weekly

feedback cadence with stakeholders — early validation, fewer expensive surprises.

What changed.

Four moves, none of them flashy. All of them load-bearing for an operator on shift.

01

Clear navigation

Restructured the IA with logical grouping and unambiguous labels. Operators found things in the place they expected them.

02

Better data viz

Charts and indicators that actually communicate state — colour, contrast, and motion serving the meaning, not decorating it.

03

Less cognitive load

Contextual information surfaced at the right time. Less hunting through screens to confirm what's happening.

04

Error prevention

Confirmation patterns and validation around critical actions. Mistakes get caught before they become incidents.

Iterating with operators.

Four rounds with the people who'd be using it the next morning. Every iteration cut a confusion the last one had revealed.

CABB SCADA dashboard — iteration 0 CABB SCADA dashboard — iteration 1 CABB SCADA dashboard — iteration 2 CABB SCADA dashboard — iteration 3

Significant improvements in usability.

The company didn't track formal metrics on the old system. The before-and-after survey did.

Improved usability

Clear hierarchy and intuitive navigation reduced the small confusions that used to compound into real operational errors.

Better data visualization

Operators could see the state of the system at a glance instead of triangulating between three screens to confirm it.

The redesigned CABB SCADA dashboard, in production
"
The new dashboard finally tells us what's going on without us having to hunt for it. New operators get up to speed in days instead of weeks.
Plant operations lead · CABB

What I took away.

Context is everything

Industrial UX without site visits is fiction. The constraints that mattered most were the ones that only show up when you're standing on the floor.

Stakeholder alignment matters

Weekly feedback with operators, managers, and engineering kept the work grounded — and stopped expensive late-stage course-corrections.

Design systems enable continuity

The team kept building after I rolled off. The system carried the standard forward without me having to be in the room.

Working on a complex data product?

Whether it's a dashboard, an internal tool, or a data-heavy workflow — I help turn complexity into clarity.

Book a 30-min call